A Look Kentucky’s Recent Football Classes, Part I

By Will

With football signing day having come and gone, I wanted to take a look at Kentucky’s last six recruiting classes to see how the members of those classes performed over the last two seasons — Kentucky’s most successful seasons in decades.

I chose to go all the way back to the 2002 class (Guy Morriss’ last class) because members of that class who redshirted were eligible during Kentucky’s 2006 season. (Plus, the furthest Rivals’* recruiting ranking archives go back is 2002, so that worked out well.)

First, a macro analysis (and I use that word loosely). I want to see where Kentucky’s last six classes rank, where Kentucky’s 2006 and 2007 opponents’ classes rank, and how Kentucky did against those opponents. [Hat tip to SMQ for the inspiration for this. If you want to see something like what’s below, but for all the Bowl Championship Series schools, by all means, click here.] Crappy Word tables and ‘analysis’ after the jump!


Here are Rivals’ rankings for Kentucky’s last six classes:

2002 Rank 2003 Rank 2004 Rank 2005 Rank 2006 Rank 2007 Rank 02-06 Avg. 03-07 Avg.
94 63 45 67 36 54 61 53

Over the last two years, Kentucky played twenty-four games against DI-A schools. The following table lists the opponent,** the average rank of the opponents’ five classes, and the result:

Opponent 2002 Rank 2003 Rank 2004 Rank 2005 Rank 2006 Rank 2007 Rank 02-06 Avg. 2006 Result 03-07 Avg. 2007 Result
Louisville 59 35 64 45 34 41 47 Loss, 59-28 44 Win, 40-34
Ole Miss 33 38 30 30 16 N/A 29 Win, 31-14 N/A N/A
Florida 20 2 7 15 2 1 9 Loss, 26-7 5 Loss, 45-37
Central Michigan 95 104 108 94 104 N/A 101 Win, 45-36 N/A N/A
South Carolina 11 8 35 23 24 6 20 Loss, 24-17 19 Loss, 38-23
LSU 15 1 2 22 7 4 9 Loss, 49-0 7 Win, 43-37
Mississippi State 17 9 62 33 44 39 33 Win, 34-31 37 Loss, 31-14
Georgia 3 6 6 10 4 9 6 Win, 24-20 7 Loss, 24-13
Vanderbilt 76 78 66 87 60 67 73 Win, 38-26 72 Win, 27-20
Louisiana-Monroe 86 91 101 103 108 N/A 98 Win, 42-40 N/A N/A
Tennessee 2 18 11 4 23 3 12 Loss, 17-12 12 Loss, 52-50
Clemson 22 67 53 17 15 N/A 35 Win, 28-20 N/A N/A
Kent State N/A 73 113 87 112 101 N/A N/A 26 Win, 56-20
Arkansas N/A 29 22 24 26 27 N/A N/A 26 Win, 42-29
Florida State N/A 21 3 2 3 21 N/A N/A 10 Win, 35-28

What does it all mean?

In 2006, Kentucky played nine games against teams with higher-ranked recruiting classes. Kentucky went 4-5 in those games. In 2006 Kentucky played three teams with lower-ranked recruiting classes and won all three of those games.

In 2007, Kentucky again played nine games against teams with higher-ranked recruiting classes and again went 4-5. Kentucky also played three games against teams with lower-ranked classes*** and won those games.

So, in the last two seasons, Kentucky is 8-10 in games against teams with higher-ranked classes and 6-0 against teams with lower-ranked classes.

To further break it down, Kentucky played seven teams with top-10 classes, and went 3-4 in those games. The wins came against Georgia in 2006, and LSU and an admittedly depleted FSU in 2007. Kentucky played eleven games against teams with top-25 classes, and went 3-8 in those games (the wins being the aforementioned three). Kentucky played eighteen games against teams with top-50 recruiting classes and went 8-11. In addition to the Georgia, LSU and FSU wins, Kentucky beat Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Georgia and Clemson in 2007 and Louisville in 2008.

Again, what does it all mean? Well, I’m not sure, but it suggests at least two things: (1) Kentucky’s coaches do a good job of evaluating and developing talent (because they’re regularly beating teams that have supposedly much better talent) and (2) Kentucky’s classes have probably been a bit underrated (same).

*For simplicity’s sake, I’m just using Rivals rather than synthesizing the various rankings out there.

**Note that Florida Atlantic isn’t included because Rivals only has a ranking for the Owls’ classes from 2007 forward.

***I’m going out on a short limb and assuming that had Florida Atlantic’s classes been ranked, they’d be lower than Kentucky’s.

Onward and upward!

Leave a Reply